Preview

Grain Economy of Russia

Advanced search

HARDNESS OF SPRING DURUM WHEAT KERNELS IN THE WEST SIBERIA

https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2019-65-5-24-28

Abstract

There have been presented study results of the spring durum wheat varieties grown in the southern forest-steppe area of the Omsk region on kernel hardness. The objects of research were the varieties of ecological variety testing conducted by various Russian and Ukrainian scientific institutions. The study was conducted in the period from 2003–2015. Experimental plots of 10 m2 were placed in 4 sequences. The varieties were sown in weedfree fallow. The soil of the experimental plot was weakly leached blackearth (chernozem), medium humus (6.2%), and loamy. The sowing date is 14–15 of May, the sowing rate is 4.5 million of germinated kernels per ha. The average hardness index in 2003–2015 was 70.1%. The varieties varied from 66.0 (the variety “Svetlana”) to 74.6% (the variety “Saratovskaya zolotistaya”). The differences between maximum and minimum were 8.6%. The variation through the years was from 51% to 92%, from 21% (the varieties “Angel”, “Omsky korund”) to 34% (the variety “Saratovskaya zolotistaya”). The calculated coefficient of variation showed that the variability degree ranged from little to medium. Coefficients of variation varied from 9.3% (the variety “Angel”) to 14.3% (the variety “Bezenchukskaya 182”). According to S. A. Eberhart, W. A. Russel the stability index indicates a lower variability of the varieties “Angel”, “Omsky korund”, “Altayskaya niva”, “Nik”, “Kharkovskaya 23”, “Tavolga”. The value of the regression coefficient (bi) for kernel hardness ranged from 0.77 to 1.23. The varieties “Voronezhskaya 9”, “Elizavetinskaya”, “Altayskaya niva”, “Omskaya stepnaya” and “Bezenchukskaya stepnaya” turned to be most responsive to the conditions (according to the Eberhart – Russell test). The varieties “Angel”, “Aleyskaya”, “Zarnitsa Altaya” had a weak reaction to the environmental conditions. There has been identified phenotypic correlation between the trait and productivity, 1000-kernel weight, nature weight, gluten quality, pasta color. The correlation between these traits is positive, on average r = 0.30–0.440.

About the Authors

M. G. Evdokimov
Omsky Agricultural Research Center
Russian Federation

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, main researcher of the laboratory of durum wheat breeding

644012, Omsk, Korolev Av., 26



V. S. Yusov
Omsky Agricultural Research Center
Russian Federation

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, head of the laboratory of durum wheat breeding

644012, Omsk, Korolev Av., 26



I. V. Pakhotina
Omsky Agricultural Research Center
Russian Federation

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, head of the laboratory of grain quality

644012, Omsk, Korolev Av., 26



M. N. Kiriyakova
Omsky Agricultural Research Center
Russian Federation

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory of durum wheat breeding

644012, Omsk, Korolev Av., 26



References

1. Agrometeorologicheskij byulleten’ [Agrometeorological bulletin]. Omsk: Omskij CGMS, 2003–2018.

2. Vasil’chuk N. S. Selekciya yarovoj tverdoj pshenicy [Spring durum wheat breeding]. Saratov, 2001. 123 s.

3. V’yushkov A. A., Mal’chikov P. N., Syukov V. V., Shevchenko S. N. Selekcionno-geneticheskoe uluchshenie yarovoj pshenicy [Breeding and genetic improvement of spring wheat]. Samara, 2012. 266 s.

4. Golik V. S., Golik O. V. Selekciya Triticum durum Desf. [Triticum durum Desf. breeding]. Har’kov: Magda LTD, 2008. 519 s.

5. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Methodology of a field trial]. M.: Kolos, 1973. 335 s.

6. Evdokimov M. G. Selekciya yarovoj tverdoj pshenicy v Sibirskom Priirtysh’e [Selection of spring durum wheat in the Siberian Irtysh]. Omsk: Sfera, 2006. 220 s.

7. Evdokimov M. G., Yusov V. S. Yarovaya tverdaya pshenica v Sibirskom Priirtysh’e [Spring durum wheat in the Siberian pre-Irtysh]. Omsk: Sfera, 2008. 160 s.

8. Zverev S. V., Pankrat’eva I. A., Polituha O. V. i dr. Steklovidnost’ kak pokazatel’ kachestva zerna pshenicy [Kernel hardness as an indicator of wheat grain quality] // Hranenie i pererabotka zerna. 2017. № 11(219). S. 33–34.

9. Zykin V. A., Meshkov V. V., Sapega V. A. Parametry ekologicheskoj plastichnosti sel’skohozyajstvennyh rastenij, ih raschet i analiz [Parameters of ecological adaptability of agricultural plants, their calculation and analysis]. Novosibirsk, 1984. 24 s.

10. Lelli Ya. Selekciya pshenicy [Wheat Breeding] / per. s angl. N. B. Ronis. M.: Kolos, 1980. 384 s.

11. Nadirov B. T., Morunova G. M., Dracheva L. M. Informativnost’ priznakov kachestva zerna yarovoj tverdoj pshenicy [Informational content of quality traits of spring durum wheat grain] // Selekciya i urozhaj. 1988. S. 57–63.

12. Samsonov M. M. Sil’nye i tverdye pshenicy SSSR [Strong and durum wheat of the USSR]. M.: Kolos. 1967. 167 s.

13. Sandakova G. N. Nauchno obosnovannye parametry modeli pogodnyh uslovij dlya formirovaniya vysokosteklovidnogo zerna tverdoj pshenicy v central’noj zone Orenburgskoj oblasti [Scientifically substantiated parameters of the weather model for the formation of super-hard durum wheat in the Central zone of the Orenburg region] // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 5. S. 33–37.

14. Dexter J. E., Preston K. R., Woodbeck N. J. Canadian wheat / Chapter 6 Future of flour a compendium of flour improvement. 2006. Pp. 43–62.


Review

For citations:


Evdokimov M.G., Yusov V.S., Pakhotina I.V., Kiriyakova M.N. HARDNESS OF SPRING DURUM WHEAT KERNELS IN THE WEST SIBERIA. Grain Economy of Russia. 2019;(5):24-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2019-65-5-24-28

Views: 746


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-8725 (Print)
ISSN 2079-8733 (Online)