The role of the initial material in breeding of the spring soft wheat varieties resistant to rust in Zauralye

One of the factors limiting the growth of wheat productivity in Zauralye is the crop infection with leaf-stem diseases, which regularly occur three times in ten years, reducing the harvest on 5 to 30%. In 2015–2017 only two spring soft wheat varieties “Radu­ga” (Kurgan RIA) and “Uralosibirskaya” (SibRIA) (on 8–9% of the total area) out of 17 regionalized ones showed high tolerance to epiphytoty of brown and stem rust. The genetic collections of domestic and foreign origin have been used to develop new varieties. On the epiphytotic background there were identified varieties and samples with effective resistance genes. There has been conduct­ed a target selection in the hybrid populations. There have been estimated morphologically aligned lines for reproduction. For the fast development of new varieties, there has been suggested stable and tolerant to the diseases, adaptive to local conditions initial material, namely the varieties “Sigma”, “Pamyati Leontieva”, “Boevchanka”, “Favorit”, “Novosibirskaya 31”, “Ingala”, “Sudarynia”, “Gerakl”, “Uralosibirskaya”, “Raduga” taken in the collection nursery; and the varieties and lines “Lutescens 120”, “Novosibirskaya 18”, “Rodnik”, “Lutescens 27-12”, “Lutescens 248/05-3”, “LD 25”, “Lutescens 34/08-19”, “Element 22”, “Lutescens 6/04-4” taken in the nursery of the Kazakh-Siberian Spring Wheat Improvement Network (KSSWIN). There have been identified 1340 highly productive lines out of 57 hybrid populations resistant to a wide range of brown rust types, including the virulent type Ug99. The 5 lines from the Siberian Breeding Nursery (SPCS) with complex resistance to brown and stem rust, powdery mildew and 6 varieties with the identified resistance genes to stem rust Sr31, Sr25 are of particular interest. The studied material is included in the breeding process.

1. Belan I. A., Rosseeva L. P., Meshkova L. V., SHepelev S. S., Zelenskij Yu. I. Immunologicheskaya ocenka materiala “KASIBˮ v usloviyah yuzhnoj lesostepi Zapadnoj Sibiri [Immunological evaluation of the KASIB material in the southern forest-steppe of the Western Siberia] // Vestnik Altajskogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2012. № 10(96). S. 39–42.

2. Voronkova A. A. Genetiko-immunologicheskie osnovy selekcii pshenicy na ustojchivost’ k rzhavchine [Genetic and immunological basis of wheat breeding on rust resistance]. M.: Kolos, 1980. 192 s.

3. Gul’tyaeva E. I. Raznoobrazie rossijskih sortov myagkoj pshenicy po genam ustojchivosti k buroj rzhavchine [Diversity of the Russian spring soft wheat varieties according to their brown rust resistance] // Sovremennye problemy immuniteta rastenij k vrednym organizmam: materialy IV Mezhdunar. konferencii. SPb. – Pushkin, 2016. 124 s.

4. Davoyan Eh. R., Bespalova L. A., Davoyan R. O., Zubanova Yu. S., Mikov D. S., Filobok V. A., Hudokormova Zh. N. Ispol’zovanie molekulyarnyh markerov v selekcii pshenicy na ustojchivost’ k buroj rzhavchine v Krasnodarskom NIISKH im. P. P. Luk’yanenko [The use of molecular markers in wheat breeding on brown rust resistance in the Krasnodar NIIRKh named after P. P. Lukyanenko] // Vavilovskij zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2014. T. 18, № 4/1. S. 732–736.

5. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Methodology of a field trial]. M.: Agropromizdat, 1958. 351 s.

6. Sochalova L. P., Lihenko I. E. Geneticheskaya ustojchivost’ sortov yarovoj pshenicy k obligatno-aehrogennym zabolevaniyam v usloviyah lesostepi Priob’ya [Genetic resistance of spring wheat varieties to obligate-aerogenic diseases in the forest steppe of the Pre-Ob region]. Katalog sortov-donorov genov ustojchivosti. Novosibirsk, 2011. 15 s.

7. Shamanin V. P., Potockaya I. V., Klevakina M. V. Ocenka sibirskoj kollekcii yarovoj myagkoj pshenicy na ustojchivost’ k steblevoj rzhavchine v usloviyah yuzhnoj lesostepi Zapadnoj Sibiri [Estimation of the Siberian collection of spring soft wheat on stem rust resistance in the southern forest-steppe of the Western Siberia] // Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU. 2016. № 2(40). S. 55–58.