The effect of moisture supply conditions on productivity of winter bread wheat, sown after various forecrops in the southern part of the Rostov region
https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-83-87
Abstract
Weather and climatic conditions determine moisture supply, which is the main factor affecting winter wheat productivity in the area of unstable moisture. The current study was carried out on the experimental plot of the laboratory for cultivation technology of grain crops of the FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy” in 2010–2020. The soil of the experimental plot was ordinary calcareous heavy loamy blackearth (chernozem). The humus horizon was powerful up to 140 cm. The humus content was 3.9%. The purpose of the study was to establish the moisture supply of winter bread wheat when cultivated according to various forecrops. There has been found that the autumn periods in the most years of study were arid with 37% of precipitation. Winter wheat plants from September to June were provided with 70% of precipitation, with a 1022.55 of air humidity deficit and 664.7 mm of water demand. There was found that, on average over the years of study, 88% of moisture supply promoted yielding of 7.03 t/ha of winter wheat sown in weedfree fallow. In order to yield a ton of grain there was required 591.7 m3 of total moisture. The share of precipitation in this moisture consumption was 84%, and the share of soil moisture was 16%. When sown after sunflower, moisture provision was 77%, and winter wheat yield was 5.32 t/ha. In order to yield a ton of grain there was required 657.3 m3 of total moisture, which was on 65.6 m3 more than in the variant with a weedfree fallow. The share of precipitation in this moisture consumption was 96%, and the share of soil moisture was 4%.
About the Authors
A. S. Popov
Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, head of the department of cultivation technology of grain row crops
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
G. V. Ovsyannikova
Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, leading researcher of the laboratory for cultivation technology of grain crops
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
А. А. Sukharev
Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory for cultivation technology of grain crops
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
References
1. Alabushev A.V. Sostoyanie i puti effektivnoj otrasli rastenievodstva (izbrannye trudy) [The state and ways of an effective crop production industry (selected works)]. Rostov n/D.: ZAO «Kniga», 2012. 234 s.
2. Alabushev A.V., Popov A.S. Vliyanie vremeni prekrashcheniya osennej vegetacii i vozobnovleniya vesennej vegetacii na urozhajnost' tverdoj ozimoj pshenicy [The effect of the time of autumn vegetation termination and spring vegetation resumption on durum winter wheat productivity] // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2015. № 11(141). S. 6-11.
3. Alabushev A.V., YAnkovskij N.G., Ovsyannikova G.V., Popov A.S., Suharev A.A. Analiz pogodnyh uslovij v yuzhnoj zone Rostovskoj oblasti za 1930-2015 gody [Analysis of weather conditions in the southern part of the Rostov region for 1930-2015] // Vestnik rossijskoj sel'skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2017. № 1. S. 23-27.
4. Alpat'ev A.M. Vlagooborot kul'turnyh rastenij [Moisture turnover of cultivated plants]. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1954. 248 s.
5. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovanij) [Methodology of a field trial (with the basics of statistical processing of the study results)]. M.: ID Al'yans, 2011. 6-e izd., Stereotip. 352 s.
6. Ionova E.V., Lihovidova V.A., Lobunskaya I.A. Zasuha i gidrotermicheskij koefficient uvlazhneniya kak odin iz kriteriev ocenki stepeni ee intensivnosti (obzor literatury) [Drought and hydrothermal moisture coefficient as one of the criteria for assessing its intensity degree (literature review)] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2019. №6 (66). S. 18-22. DOI: 10.31367/2079-8725-2019-66-6-18-22.
7. Kayumov M.K. Spravochnik po programmirovaniyu urozhaev [Recommendations on crops programming]. M.: Rossel'hozizdat, 1977. 188 s.
8. Popov A.S. Vlagoobespechennost' posevov tverdoj ozimoj pshenicy pri vozdelyvanii po razlichnym predshestvennikam [Moisture supply of winter durum wheat during cultivation according to various forecrops] // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2019. T. 33. № 11. S. 10-13. DOI: 10.24411/0235-2451-2019-11102.
9. Samofalova N.E., Dubinina O.A., Samofalov A.P., Ilichkina N.P. Rol' meteofaktorov v formirovanii produktivnosti ozimoj tverdoj pshenicy [The role of weather factors in the formation of winter durum wheat productivity] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2019. № 5(65). S.18-23. DOI: 10.31367/2079-8725-2019-65-5-18-23.
10. Alemu Z.A., Dioha M.O. Climate change and trend analysis of temperature: the case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia // Environ Syst Res 9, 27 (2020). DOI:10.1186/s40068-020-00190-5.
11. Dioha M.O., Kumar A. Exploring greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for agriculture in Africa: The case of Nigeria // Ambio 49, 1549–1566 (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01293-9.
12. Trnka M., Balek J., Brázdil R., Dubrovský M., Eitzinger J., Hlavinka P., Chuchma F., Možný M., Prášil I., Růžek P., Semerádová D., Štěpánek P., Zahradníček P., Žalud Z. Observed changes in the agroclimatic zones in the Czech Republic between 1961 and 2019 // Plant Soil Environ., 67: 154–163. (2021) DOI: 10.17221/327/2020-PSE
Review
For citations:
Popov A.S., Ovsyannikova G.V., Sukharev А.А. The effect of moisture supply conditions on productivity of winter bread wheat, sown after various forecrops in the southern part of the Rostov region. Grain Economy of Russia. 2021;(6):83-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-83-87
Views:
326
Email this article 