The effect of environmental factors on oats resistance to loose smut
https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-69-3-72-76
Abstract
Loose smut (Ustilago avenae (Pers.) Rostr.) is the most dangerous and harmful disease with a wide distribution area. The purpose of the current study was to screen spring oat genotypes for resistance to loose smut and the stability of this trait on an artificial infectious background, and to identify resistant forms. There has been established that the large varieties damage in the first 5–10 days after sowing infected seed was caused by negative temperatures on the soil surface (correlation coefficient (r) was 0.95 and 0.90, respectively), and by average daily air temperature (r = 0.94–0.76), the minimum temperature on the soil surface (r = 0.86 and 0.82) and soil temperature at a depth of 5 cm (r = 0.87 and 0.78). The effect of precipitation was noted in a later period of 30–60 days after sowing (r = 0.88–0.72). On an infectious background there have been estimated 296 chaffy and hulled oats varieties. Among them there have been identified the genotypes with very high (188h12, 256h12, I-4845, 213h13, 233h13 and 256h13) and practical (119h11, 178h13, 194h13, 245h14, I-4857 and I-4903) resistance to the pathogen of 0 to 5%. In conditions of the natural development of the disease, the samples from the USA and Germany prevailed among foreign varieties with a lack of damage signs. Among the domestic ones the best results were identified in the varieties from Kirov and Ulyanovsk regions, Krasnodar Territory. The varieties 188h12, 256h12, I-4845 did not respond to changes in the environment (bi = 0). The parameters of variability (V), stability (S2), and stress resistance (xmin – xmax) of these genotypes were 0. The varieties 119h11 showed high stability (S2 = 2.2) and stress resistance (xmin – xmax = –3.7) of the trait. The oats varieties, selected due to loose smut resistance and due to stability of this trait on an infectious background are of great importance in breeding varieties with resistance to this disease.
About the Authors
Т. P. Gradoboeva
Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East, a branch of FSBSI Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named after N. V. Rudnitsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biological Sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory for immunity
612500, Kirov region, v. of Falenkii, Timiryazev Str., 3
G. A. Batalova
Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named after N. V. Rudnitsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, professor, academician of RAS, head of the department of rye breeding and seed production
610007, Kirov, Lenin Str., 166A; e-mail: fss.nauka@mail.ru
References
1. Batalova G. A. Selekciya ovsa na kachestvo zerna v Volgo-Vyatskom regione [Oats breeding for grain quality in the Volga-Vyatka region] // Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul’tury. 2018. № 3(27). S. 81–87. DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X2018-11038.
2. Gradoboeva T. P. Temnopyatnistyj askohitoz v Kirovskoj oblasti [Ascochyta leaf blight in the Kirov region] // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2018. № 2. S. 22–28.
3. Gradoboeva T. P., Batalova G. A. Sozdanie infekcionnogo fona pyl’noj golovni ovsa [Development of an infectious background of loose smut oats] // Zashchita i karantin rastenij. 2016. № 6. S. 49–50.
4. Goncharenko A. A. Ob adaptivnosti i ekologicheskoj ustojchivosti sortov zernovyh kul’tur [Adaptability and environmental sustainability of grain crop varieties] // Vestnik Rossel’hozakademii. 2005. № 6. S. 49–53.
5. Kabashov A. D., Korelina V. A., Zinina N. P. Ustojchivost’ ovsa posevnogo k pyl’noj golovne i krasno-buroj pyatnistosti na estestvennom fone razvitiya bolezni v usloviyah Severnogo regiona RF [Resistance of oats to smut and red-brown leaf spot on the natural background of the disease development in the Northern region of the Russian Federation] // Trudy po prikladnoj botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2017. T. 178, vyp. 4. S. 43–48. DOI: 10.30901/22278834-2017-4-43-48.
6. Pokudin V. Z. Ocenka ekologicheskoj plastichnosti sortov // Geneticheskij analiz kolichestvennyh i kachestvennyh priznakov s pomoshch’yu matematiko-statisticheskih metodov [Estimation of the environmental adaptability of varieties]. M.: VNIIEEISKH, 1973. S. 40–44.
7. Sanin S. S. Problemy fitosanitarii na sovremennom etape [Problems of phytosanitary conditions at present] // Izvestiya TSKHA. 2016. № 6. S. 45–55.
8. Selyaninov G. T. O sel’skohozyajstvennoj ocenke klimata // Trudy po sel’skohozyajstvennoj meteorologii [On agricultural climate estimation]. 1928. Vyp. 20. S. 165–177.
9. Starcev A. A., Zaushincena A. V., Svirkova S. V. Reakciya sortov ovsa na izmenchivost’ meteofaktorov na yuge Zapadnoj Sibiri [The reaction of oat varieties to variability of weather factors in the south of Western Siberia] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016. № 5. S. 331.
10. Yudin A. A., Sultanov F. S., Konstantinova T. V., Mishchuk G. A., Gabrahimov O. B. Selekciya ovsa posevnogo v usloviyah Irkutskoj oblasti [Oats breeding in the conditions of the Irkutsk region] // Vestnik Buryatskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii im. V. R. Fillipova. 2018. № 3. S. 27–32.
11. Zuo W., Цkmen B., Depotter J. R. L., Ebert M. K., Redkar A., Villamil J. M., Doehlemann G. Molecular Interactions Between Smut Fungi and Their Host Plants // Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2019. Vol. 57. Pp. 411–430.
Review
For citations:
Gradoboeva Т.P., Batalova G.A. The effect of environmental factors on oats resistance to loose smut. Grain Economy of Russia. 2020;(3):72-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-69-3-72-76
Views:
431
Email this article 