The effect of cultivation technologies on chickpea productivity in the southern part of the Rostov region
https://doi.org/10.31367/20798725-2020-69-3-32-37
Abstract
The field trials were carried out in 2018–2019 in the laboratory for cultivation technology of row crops of the FSBSI “AgriculturalResearchCenter“Donskoy” (Zernograd). The experimental plot is located in the southern agricultural part of theRostovregion characterized with insufficient and unstable moisture. The soil of the experimental plot is ordinary heavy loamy blackearth (chernozem) on loess-like loam, with 3.2% of humus, 18.5–20.0 of P O , 342–360 mg of K O per a kg of soil. The value of the hydrothermal coefficient in the years of study ranged from 0.28 to 0.55 (insufficient moisture supply of the growing season). The current paper has presented the study results of the effect of effect of seeding rates, sowing dates, sowing methods on productivity of the middle early ripening chickpeas variety “Privo1”. The applied agricultural techniques affected on indicators of the yield structure elements. So, the increase of the seeding rate from 0.3 to 1.0 million units/ha reduced number of seeds per plant by 7–11 pcs., decreased seed weight per plant by 1.7–2.6 g and 1000-seed weight by 35–65 g. The sowing date had the greatest effect on chickpea productivity (the effect of the factor was 42.2%), and the sowing method had the smallest (4.1%) effect on it. The largest productivity was formed in the first period with the ordinary-row method of sowing (0.76–1.06 t/ha), and the smallest productivity was formed in the third period with the wide-row method of sowing (0.44–0.71 t/ha). The correlation between the main elements of productivity (“number of seeds per plant”, “seed weight per plant”, “1000-seed weight”) and cultivation technologies was average positive (r = 0.39–0.47).
About the Authors
S. A. VasilchenkoRussian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory for cultivation technology of row crops
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru
G. V. Metlina
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, leading researcher of the laboratory for cultivation technology of row crops
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru
References
1. Ashiev A. R., Habibullin K. N., Skulova M. V. Elementy struktury urozhaya u listochkovyh i usatyh obrazcov goroha: izmenchivost’, vzaimosvyaz’ i perspektivy ih ispol’zovaniya v selekcionnom processe [Elements of the yield structure in leafy and leafless pea samples: variability, interconnection, and prospects for their use in the breeding process] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2019. № 3(63). S. 40–43. DOI: 10.31367/2079-8725-2019-63-3-40-43.
2. Bel’tyukov L. P., Gricenko A. A. Primenenie udobrenij pod zernovye kul’tury na Donu [The use of fertilizers for grain crops in the Don territory]. Zernograd, 1993. 226 s.
3. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanij) [Methodology of a field trial (with the basics of statistical processing of study results)]: uchebnik dlya vysshih sel’skohozyajstvennyh uchebnyh zavedenij. Stereotip. izd. Perepech. s 5-go izd., dop. i pererab., 1985 g. M.: Al’yans, 2014. 351 s.
4. Kovtunov V. V. Posevnaya ploshchad’ i urozhajnost’ sorgo zernovogo [Sown area and productivity of grain sorghum] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2018. № 3(57). S. 47–49. DOI: 10.31367/2079-8725-2018-57-3-47-49.
5. Metodika Gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel’skohozyajstvennyh kul’tur [Methods of State Variety Testing of agricultural crops]. M.: Kolos, 1989. 250 s.
6. Popov A. S., Gerasimenko G. P., Marchenko D. M., Gerasimenko T. V., Yacenko V. A., Ignat’eva N. G. Osobennosti pogodnyh uslovij v yuzhnoj zone Rostovskoj oblasti [Features of weather conditions in the southern part of the Rostov region] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2012. № 5. S. 46–50.
7. Posevnye ploshchadi, valovye sbory i urozhajnost’ nuta v Rossii. Itogi 2018 goda [Sown area, gross harvests and productivity of chickpea in Russia. The results of 2018] [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://ab-centre.ru/ news/posevnye-ploschadi-valovye-sbory-i-urozhaynost-nuta-v-rossii-itogi-2018-goda.
8. Ptashnik O. P. Tekhnologicheskie priyomy vyshchivaniya nuta v usloviyah stepnogo Kryma [Technological methods of chickpea cultivation in the conditions of the steppe in Crimea] // Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul’tury. 2017. № 4(24). S. 13–19.
9. Pyl’nev V. V., Konovalov Yu. B. Chastnaya selekciya polevyh kul’tur [Private breeding of field crops]. M.: Kolos. 2005. 522 s.
10. Shest’ sel’skohozyajstvennyh zon Rostovskoj oblasti – harakteristika [Six agricultural zones of the Rostov region, their characteristics] [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://rosng.ru/post/content-shest-selskohozyaystvennyhzon-rostovskoy-oblasti-harakteristika.
Review
For citations:
Vasilchenko S.A., Metlina G.V. The effect of cultivation technologies on chickpea productivity in the southern part of the Rostov region. Grain Economy of Russia. 2020;(3):32-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/20798725-2020-69-3-32-37