The estimation of the adaptability of collection pea plants productivity

The current paper has presented the study results of the estimation of the adaptability of plant productivity of 131 collection pea samples in the southern zone of the Rostov region, carried out according to the method proposed by V. V. Khangildin (1984).

The most agroecological methodologies of estimation have significant drawbacks. Firstly, these are calculations, which are difficult to be done. Secondly, it is the effect of the indicators of other samples on the final index of homeostaticity for the selected sample. The fact is essential when working with a large number of samples, i. e. collection, which has defective and annually updated material and if the composition of the collection changes, it is not necessary to recalculate homeostatic parameters according to the method proposed by V. V. Khangildin. Meteorological conditions during the years of research were characterized with unstable weather conditions, which made it possible to objectively evaluate samples under different vegetation conditions. According to the 2017– 2019 studies there were identified the samples “Tatyana” (Russia), “Damir” (Denmark), “19/91 C” (Portugal), “Mutant 561” (Russia), “Kudesnik” (Belarus) with a large “seed weight per plant”. The indicators of stress resistance and homeostaticity of these varieties’ productivity were average for the collection. The greatest homeostaticity of this indicator was identified in the samples “193/73” (Ukraine), “6995x6575” (Russia) with the average “seed weight per plant” for the collection. The study results of the homeostaticity of the collection pea plants productivity will be used as initial material in further breeding work.

1. Vozhzhova N. N., Kravchenko N. S. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost’ sortov ozimoj myagkoj pshenicy po pokazatelyu “obshchaya hlebopekarnaya ocenka” [Ecological plasticity of winter soft wheat varieties according to the trait “general baking estimation”] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2014. № 1(31). S. 22–26.

2. Davletov F. A. Selekciya neosypayushchihsya sortov goroha v usloviyah Yuzhnogo Urala [Breeding of non-shed pea varieties in the conditions of the Southern Urals]. Ufa: Gilem, 2008. 236 s.

3. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanij) [Methodology of a field trial (with the basics of statistical processing of study results)]. 5-e izd., dop. i pererab. M.: Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2012. 352 s.

4. EMISS gosudarstvennaya statistika [EMISS State Statistics] [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.fedstat.ru.

5. Zhuchenko A. A. Adaptivnoe rastenievodstvo (ekologo-geneticheskie osnovy): teoriya i praktika [Adaptive crop production (ecological and genetic basis)]. T. III. Osobennosti realizacii strategii adaptivnoj intensifikacii rastenievodstva v usloviyah Rossii. M.: Agrorus, 2009. 960 s.

6. Zhuchenko A. A. Mobilizaciya geneticheskih resursov cvetkovyh rastenij na osnove ih identifikacii i sistematizacii [Mobilization of the genetic resources of flowering plants based on their identification and systematization]. M., 2012. 584 s.

7. Zonal’nye sistemy zemledeliya Rostovskoj oblasti na 2013–2020 gody [Zoned agricultural systems of the Rostov region for 2013–2020]. Ch. I. Rostov n/D.: Donskoj izdatel’skij dom, 2013. 248 s.

8. Ignat’ev S. A., Regidin A. A. Ocenka parametrov adaptivnosti kollekcionnyh obrazcov esparceta [Estimation of adaptability parameters of sainfoin collection samples] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2019. № 3(63). S. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2019-63-3-53-58.

9. Kravchenko N. S., Ionova E. V. Stepen’ adaptivnosti sortov ozimoj myagkoj pshenicy v usloviyah provokacionnogo fona (“zasushnik”) [The degree of adaptability of winter soft wheat varieties in the conditions of a provocative background (“zasushnik”)] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2015. № 5(41). S. 7–10.

10. Lahanov A. P. Rol’ fiziologii rastenij v izuchenii i povyshenii biologicheskogo potenciala zernobobovyh i krupyanyh kul’tur [The role of plant physiology in the study and increase the biological potential of legumes and groats] // Biologicheskij i ekonomicheskij potencial zernobobovyh, krupyanyh kul’tur i puti ego realizacii: mat. Mezhdunar. nauch. konferencii, priurochennoj k 35-letiyu VNII zernobobovyh i krupyanyh kul’tur. Orel, 1999. S. 33–39.

11. Metodika Gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel’skohozyajstvennyh kul’tur [Methods of the State Variety Testing of agricultural crops]. M. 1985. Vyp. 1. 269 s.

12. Rybas’ I. A., Gureeva A. V. Ocenka sortov ozimoj myagkoj pshenicy po urozhajnosti i parametram adaptivnosti [Estimation of winter soft wheat varieties according to productivity and adaptability] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2014. № 1(31). S. 18–22.

13. Hangil’din V. V., Biryukov S. V. Problema gomeostaza v genetiko-selekcionnyh issledovaniyah [The problem of homeostasis in genetic breeding studies] // Genetiko-citologicheskie aspekty v selekcii s.-h. rastenij. 1984. № 1. S. 67–76.