Adaptive potential of winter common wheat varieties in the Penza region
https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2024-91-2-75-79
Abstract
The current paper has presented the results of long-term study (2014–2023) of productivity, adaptability parameters and correlation between a genotype and environment of winter common wheat varieties in the forest-steppe conditions of the Penza region.
The purpose of the study was to determine the response of winter common wheat varieties in changing agroclimatic conditions according to productivity.
The vegetation conditions during the years of study varied in temperature and amount of precipitation, which served as a good background for conducting research on the issue in question. The objects for the study were 9 zoned varieties approved for cultivation in the Middle Volga region and 5 winter common wheat varieties developed by the FSBRI CBFC. The zoned winter common wheat variety ‘Fotiniya’ was used as a standard. The years of the varieties’ study were divided into favorable, typical (mean) and unfavorable (dry, excessively wet). Winter common wheat productivity in favorable years averaged 5.68 t/ha, in typical years it was 4.32 t/ha and 2.19 t/ in unfavorable years. As a result of determining the response of winter common wheat varieties in changing agroclimatic conditions according to productivity, there was proven a strong effect of environmental conditions and genotype. There have been proposed for breeding use such valuable and stable genotypes of winter common wheat as ‘Biryuza’, ‘Skipetr’, ‘Don-eko’, ‘Alyonushka’, ‘Pamyati Krivobocheka’, ‘Surskaya Nika’, ‘Dargo’, which should be placed on a high and medium agricultural background. The varieties ‘Fotiniya’ and ‘Klavdiya 2’ are highly adaptable to unfavorable cultivation conditions and will have an advantage over other varieties in medium and low agricultural backgrounds.
About the Author
S. V. KosenkoRussian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, leading researcher
laboratory for breeding technologies
170041; Komsomolsky Av., 17/56; Tver region; Tver
e-mail: info@fnclk.ru
References
1. Dospekhov, B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoi obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovanii) [Methodology of a field trial (with the basics of statistical processing of the study results)]. 5 izdanie, pererab. i dopoln. Stereotip izd. M.: Al'yans. 2014. 351 s
2. Zhuchenko, A. A. Resursnyi potentsial proizvodstva zerna v Rossii [Resource potential of grain production in Russia]. Moskva, 2004. 1109 s.
3. Krupin P. Yu., Divashuk M. G., Karlov G. I. Ispol'zovanie geneticheskogo potentsiala mnogoletnikh dikorastushchikh zlakov v selektsionnom uluchshenii pshenitsy (obzor) [Use of the genetic potential of perennial wild cereals in the breeding improvement of wheat (review)] // Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. 2019. № 54(3). S. 409–425. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.3.409rus
4. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh kul'tur [Methodology of the State Variety Testing of agricultural crops]. Vypusk 1. Obshchaya chast'. M.: Kolos. 2019. 329 s.
5. Syukov V. V., Zakharov V. G., Mal'chikov P. N., Krivobochek V. G., Nikonov V. I., Vasilova N. Z., Ganeev V. A., Gulaeva N. V., Menibaev A. I. Effektivnost' statisticheskikh metodov otsenki adaptivnosti genotipov yarovoi myagkoi pshenitsy vdol' ekologicheskogo vektora [Efficiency of statistical estimation of the adaptability of spring common wheat genotypes along the environmental vector] // Agrarnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2019. № 2. S. 4–12. DOI: 10.28983/asj.y2019i2pp4-12
6. Sh'yurova N. A., Subbotin A. G., Zhuzhukin V. I., Narushev V. B., Mukhatova Zh. N., Bashinskaya O. S. Selektsionnaya otsenka sortoobraztsov i linii yarovoi tverdoi pshenitsy v zasushlivykh usloviyakh Nizhnego Povolzh'ya [Breeding estimation of spring durum wheat variety samples and lines in the arid conditions of the Lower Volga region] // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2019. № 12 (chast' 2). S. 236–242. DOI: 10.17513/use.37295
7. Bornhofen E., Benin G., Storck L., Guilherme L., Thiago W., Matheus D., Stoco G., Marchioro S. V. Statistical methods to study adaptability and stability of wheat genotypes // Bragantia. 2017. Vol. 76(1), R. 1–10. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.557
8. Horn L., Shimelis H., Sarsu F., Mwadzingeni L., Laing M. D. Genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield among novel cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) selections derived by gamma irradiation // The Crop Journal. 2018. Vol. 6(3), R. 306–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.10.002
9. Kendal, E. Comparing durum wheat cultivars by genotype ½ yield ½ trait and genotype ½ trait biplot method // Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2019. Vol. 79(4), R. 512–522. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392019000400512
10. Simion T., Mohammed W., Amsalu B. Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis 979 of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes for yield in Ethiopia // Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 2018. Vol. 10(9), R. 249–257. DOI: 10.5897/JPBCS2018.0753
Review
For citations:
Kosenko S.V. Adaptive potential of winter common wheat varieties in the Penza region. Grain Economy of Russia. 2024;16(2):75-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2024-91-2-75-79