Preview

Grain Economy of Russia

Advanced search

Biochemical composition and nutritional value of green mass of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines

https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2023-84-1-64-69

Abstract

There have been presented the study results of the biochemical composition of the green mass of sandy sainfoin (Onobrychis arenaria) samples developed by the FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”. The purpose of the current study was to identify the variability of the content of raw nutrients: protein, oil, fiber, ash, BEV in the green mass of sainfoin varieties and lines, to determine the amino acid composition of protein and to identify the best samples for the studied traits. The study was carried out in the period of 2017–2021. The variety ‘Zernogradsky 2’ was used as a standard variety. Biochemical analyzes were carried out in the period ‘budding stage – blooming stage’. The chemical composition of the selected samples was carried out in accordance with the methodology and GOSTs. The maximum crude protein percentage was determined in promising lines ‘Sin 8/95’ (15.38 %) and ‘Sin 13/95’ (14.72 %). There was found that the varieties ‘Veles’ (10.6 %), ‘Atamansky’ (14.1 %) and the lines ‘Sin 13/95’ (11.8 %), ‘Sin 8/95’ (16.9 %) were characterized by a high concentration of raw ash. The optimal fiber content was established in the varieties ‘Atamansky’ (29.73 %) and ‘Veles’ (29.61%). As a result of determining the amino acid composition of protein, there was found that the line ‘Sin 8/95’ (68.5 g/kg) and the varieties ‘Zernogradsky 2’ (62.3 g/kg), ‘Veles’ (52.5 g/kg) were distinguished by the collection of essential amino acids. The varieties ‘Veles’ (75.0 g/kg), ‘Zernogradsky 2’ (66.5 g/kg) and the line ‘Sin 8/95’ (66.4 g/kg) were distinguished by the number of non-essential amino acids. The line ‘Sin 8/95’ (134.9 g/kg) and the varieties ‘Veles’ (127.5 g/kg), ‘Zernogradsky 2’ (128.8 g/kg) were characterized by a high total collection of amino acids. There was determined that crude protein percentage (from 4.3–18.4 %), fiber (7.8–16.9 %), dry matter (4.5–13.1 %) and BEV (9.6–15.9 %) were characterized by slight and medium variation in values. The content of crude ash (9.6–25.2 %) and crude oil (7.5–27.8 %) had weak, medium and strong variations depending on the variety and line. The study of the biochemical composition of sainfoin made it possible to establish varietal differences and variability of traits that characterize the nutritional value of the feed. The varieties ‘Veles’, ‘Zernogradsky 2’ and the promising line ‘Sin 8/95’ were found to have the best quality traits, which could be recommended for use in the breeding process as sources of useful traits and properties. 

About the Authors

N. S. Kravchenko
FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation

Candidate of Biological Sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory  for biochemical estimation of breeding material and seed quality

347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok street, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru



S. A. Ignatiev
FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, leading researcher of the laboratory  for breeding and seed production of perennial grasses

347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok street, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru



N. G. Ignatieva
FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation

technician-researcher of the laboratory for biochemical estimation  of breeding material and seed quality

347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok street, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru



A. A. Regidin
FSBSI Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”
Russian Federation

junior researcher of the laboratory for breeding and seed production of perennial grasses

347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok street, 3; e-mail: vniizk30@mail.ru



References

1. Blokhina E. A. Povyshenie produktivnosti zelenoi massy sorgo sakharnogo v usloviyakh dernovopodzolistoi pochvy severo-vostoka Belarusi [Improving productivity of sweet sorghum green mass in the conditions of soddy-podzolic soil in the north-east of Belarus] // Agrokhimicheskii vestnik. 2014. № 4. S. 33–37.

2. Davletov F. A., Gainullina K. P., Magafurova F. F. Sravnitel'noe izuchenie khozyaistvennobiologicheskikh priznakov u sortov gorokha, sozdannykh v Respublike Bashkortostan za poslednie 30 let* [Comparative study of economic and biological traits of the pea varieties developed in the Republic of Bashkortostan over the past 30 years*] // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. № 4 (84). S. 72–77.

3. Ignat'ev S. A., Regidin A. A. Rezul'tativnost' selektsii espartseta na kormovuyu i semennuyu produktivnost' [The efficiency of sainfoin breeding for feed and seed productivity] // Zernovoe khozyaistvo Rossii. 2018. № 3(57). S. 49–52. DOI 10.31367/2079-8725-2018-57-3-49-52.

4. Makarenkov M. A., Kozlov N. N., Komkova T. N., Korovina V. L. Sravnitel'naya otsenka kollektsionnykh obraztsov mnogoletnikh bobovykh kormovykh rastenii [Comparative estimation of collection samples of perennial leguminous feed plants] // Mnogofunktsional'noe adaptivnoe kormoproizvodstvo: sbornik statei. 2021. T. 26 (74). S. 35–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33814/MAK-2021-26-74-35-43.

5. Semenov V. V., Kononenko S. I., Kononenko I. S. Pitatel'nost' i aminokislotnyi sostav sortov zerna sorgo, ispol'zuemykh v kormlenii zhivotnykh [Nutritional value and amino acid composition of sorghum grain varieties used in animal feeding] // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Stavropol'skogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta zhivotnovodstva i kormoproizvodstva. 2011. T. 1. № 4–1. S. 86–88.

6. Tarasenko, N. A. Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya vtorichnykh produktov pererabotki rastitel'nogo syr'ya v retsepturakh belkovo-uglevodnykh obogatitelei [Prospects for the use of secondary products of vegetable raw materials’ processing in the formulations of protein-carbohydrate enrichers] // Izvestiya vuzov. Pishchevaya tekhnologiya. 2017. № 2–3. S. 10–13.

7. Tarasenko N. A., Nikonovich Yu. N., Butina E. A. Osobennosti khimicheskogo sostava poroshka semyan espartseta [Features of the sainfoin seed powder’s chemical composition] // Izvestiya vuzov. Pishchevaya tekhnologiya. 2016. № 2–3. S. 17–21.

8. Cherepok I. A., Borovik A. A., Abraskova S. V. Sozdanie produktivnogo travostoya na osnove espartseta peschanogo dlya polucheniya kachestvennogo sena [Development of a productive grass stand based on sandy sainfoin to obtain high-quality hay] // Zemledelie i selektsiya v Belarusi. 2021. № 57. S. 158–164.

9. Mora-Ortiz M., Swain M. T., Vickers M. J., Hegarty M. J., Kelly R., Smith L. M. J., Skøt L. De-novo transcriptome assembly for gene identification, analysis, annotation, and molecularmarker discovery in Onobrychis viciifolia // BMC genomics. 2016. Vol. 17(1), Article number 756. DOI: 10/1186/s12864-0163083-6.

10. Regidin A., Ignatiev S. The study of the sources of valuable economic and biological traits in the collection nursery of sainfoin // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 937, Article number 022124. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/937/2/022124.


Review

For citations:


Kravchenko N.S., Ignatiev S.A., Ignatieva N.G., Regidin A.A. Biochemical composition and nutritional value of green mass of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines. Grain Economy of Russia. 2023;(1):64-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2023-84-1-64-69

Views: 145


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-8725 (Print)
ISSN 2079-8733 (Online)