Leaf surface index as an indicator of moisture responsiveness and drought resistance of winter bread wheat samples
https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-9-14
Abstract
The growth and productivity of drought-prone varieties are strongly influenced by the chlorophyll pigment content and the development of plants’ foliage. The current climate changing, characterized by long no-rain periods followed by short intense rainfalls, is forcing plants to adopt different strategies to cope with drought. The purpose of the current study is to estimate the effect of growing conditions on the indicators of the total leaf area, leaf surface index (LSI) of sowing, the concentration of chlorophylls (Chl) in the leaves and the yield of winter wheat, depending on the value of their moisture supply. There have been established that the leaf surface index change and the preservation of chlorophyll pigment in foliage during the vegetation period is closely related to plants’ drought resistance, soil moisture reserve and a genotype. Under conditions of insufficient moisture supply, the maximum values of the leaf surface index in the heading phase were formed by the varieties ‘Krasa Dona’ (5.99 r.u) and ‘Etyud’ (2.49 r.u.). The highest content of chlorophyll pigment, both in the heading phase and in the flowering phase, was identified in the varieties ‘Krasa Dona’ (3.7; 3.0 mg/100 g of raw material), ‘Etyud’ (3.4; 3.2 mg/100 g of raw material) and ‘Volny Don’ (3.2; 3.0 mg/100 g of raw material), respectively. Acording to the value of productivity, the reliably standard variety ‘Don 107’ has exceeded the varieties ‘Etyud’, ‘Krasa Dona’, ‘Asket’, ‘Volny Don’.
About the Authors
V. L. GazeRussian Federation
Junior researcher of the laboratory for plant physiology
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
V. A. Golubova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biological Sciences, researcher of the laboratory for plant physiology
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
I. A. Lobunskaya
Russian Federation
Agronomist of the laboratory for plant physiology
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3
References
1. Bondarenko V.V., Kormilicyna O.V., Koolen D. Opredelenie indeksa listovoj poverhnosti na osnove analiza cifrovyh izobrazhenij krony i ego ispol'zovanie dlya ocenki kategorij sostoyaniya derev'ev [Identification of the leaf surface index based on the analysis of digital images of the crown and its use to estimate the tree condition categories] // Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoj vestnik. 2016. № 1. S. 94-98.
2. Nikolaeva M.K., Maevskaya S.N., SHugaev A.G., Buhov N.G. Vliyanie zasuhi na soderzhanie hlorofilla i aktivnost' fermentov antioksidantnoj sistemy v list'yah trekh sortov pshenicy, razlichayushchihsya po produktivnosti [The effect of drought on the chlorophyll content and the activity of enzymes of the antioxidant system in the leaves of three wheat varieties, differing in productivity] // Fiziologiya rastenij. 2011. T. 57. № 1. S. 94-102.
3. Nikolenko V.V., Kotov S.F. Metod opredeleniya ploshchadi listvoj dekorativnyh sortov zemlyaniki [Method for estimating the area of foliage of decorative strawberry varieties] // Ekosistemy, ih optimizaciya i ohrana. 2010. Vyp. 2. S. 99-105.
4. Podushin YU.V., Ol'hovskij M.YU., Fedulov YU.P. Vliyanie faktorov agrotekhniki na indeks listovoj poverhnosti i soderzhanie hlorofilla v list'yah ozimoj pshenicy [The effect of agricultural technology factors on the leaf surface index and chlorophyll content in winter wheat leaves] // Politematicheskij setevoj elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal KubGAU, 2009. № 51(7). S. 319-326.
5. Pryadkin G.L. Pigmenty, effektivnost' fotosinteza i produktivnost' pshenicy [Pigments, photosynthetic efficiency and wheat productivity] // Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2018. T. 14. № 1. S. 97-108. DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.1.2018.126524.
6. Osipova S.V., Rudikovskij A.V., Permyakov A.V., Rudikovskaya E.G., Permyakova M.D., Verhoturov V.V., Pshenichnikova T.A. Fiziologicheskie reakcii linij pshenicy (Triticum aestivum L.) s geneticheski razlichnym opusheniem lista na vodnyj deficit [Physiological reactions of wheat lines (Triticum aestivum L.) with genetically different foliage to water deficit] // Vavilovskij zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2020. 24(8) S. 813-820. DOI: 10.18699/VJ20.678.
7. Sapega V.A. Potencial urozhajnosti, stressoustojchivost' i ekologicheskaya plastichnost' srednerannih sortov yarovoj pshenicy [Yield potential, stress resistance and ecological plasticity of midearly spring wheat varieties] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2016. № 2(44). S 6-10.
8. Budak H., Kantar M., Yucebilgili Kurtoglu K. Drought tolerance in modern and wild wheat. Sci. World J., V. 2013. Article number 548246.
9. Mir R.R., Zaman-Allah M., Sreenivasulu N., Trethowan R., Varshney, R.K. Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Theor. Appl. Genet., V. 125. 2012 r. 625-645.
10. Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Expt. Bot, 58, 2007 r. 221-227. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl164.
Review
For citations:
Gaze V.L., Golubova V.A., Lobunskaya I.A. Leaf surface index as an indicator of moisture responsiveness and drought resistance of winter bread wheat samples. Grain Economy of Russia. 2021;(6):9-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-9-14