Homeostaticity of the collection samples of soybeans according to the trait “seed weight per plant”
https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-71-5-68-72
Abstract
The current paper has presented the study results on the homeostaticity of the collection samples of soybeans according to the trait “seed weight per plant” in the southern part of the Rostov region, conducted on the fields of the FSBSI “Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy” in 2017-2019. The purpose of the research was to determine the homeostaticity of the collection samples of soybeans according to the trait “seed weight per plant”. The objects of the research were 75 samples of soybeans of the middle early ripening group, which varied according to their morphological, biological and economically valuable traits and properties. There have been selected 27 collection samples of soybeans, which significantly exceeded the standard variety in terms of to the trait “seed weight per plant”. The soybean variety ‘Don 21' developed in the FSBSI “Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy” was used as a standard variety. The meteorological conditions during the growing season of soybeans during the years of study were different, which made it possible to objectively estimate the parameters of homeostaticity. For statistical processing of the results obtained, there were used the Dospekhov's methods of analysis of variance, the homeostaticity indices (Hom) were calculated according to V. V. Khangildin. (1984). According to the study results, it was established that the sample ‘Veselovskaya 5', ‘Line 504/11' and ‘PR 110370 OZ 006' had high productivity indices per a plant, along with high homeostaticity indices. There has been recommended to use them in breeding for homeostaticity and ecological adaptability. The highly productive samples ‘Im 55-2', ‘Kyoto', ‘Kofu', ‘Line 696-1', ‘M-91-212006, ‘RZhT Shuna', ‘SVH 14 TOS 1D' have shown a low index of homeostaticity. They could be characterized as the samples responsive to the improvement of environmental conditions and could be recommended as an initial material when developing varieties of intensive type.
About the Authors
A. R. AshievRussian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, senior researcher.
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3.
M. V. Skulova
Russian Federation
Agronomist.
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3.
A. V. Chegunova
Russian Federation
Junior researcher.
347740, Rostov region, Zernograd, Nauchny Gorodok, 3.
References
1. Babajceva T. A. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost' kollekcionnyh obrazcov ozimoj tritikale po zimostojkosti [Ecological adaptability of winter triticale collection samples according to winter tolerance] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2017. № 6(54). S. 7-11.
2. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovanij) [Methodology of a field trial (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)]: 5-e izd., dop. i pererab. M.: Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2012. 352 s.
3. Zonal'nye sistemy zemledeliya Rostovskoj oblasti na 2013-2020 gody [Zonal farming systems of the Rostov region for 2013-2020]. Ch. I. Rostov n/D., 2013. 248 s.
4. Ignat'ev S. A., Regidin A. A. Ocenka parametrov adaptivnosti kollekcionnyh obrazcov esparceta [Evaluation of the adaptability parameters of sainfoin collection samples] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2019. № 3(63). S. 53-58.
5. Lavrinenko G. T., Babich A. A., Kuzin V. F., Gubanov P. E. Soya [Soybean]. M.: Rossel'hozizdat, 1978. 189 s.
6. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skohozyajstvennyh kul'tur [Methodology of the State Variety Testing of agricultural crops]. M.: Kolos, 1989. 250 s.
7. Penchukov V. M., Medyannikov N. V., Kappushev A. U. Kul'tura bol'shih vozmozhnostej [A culture of great opportunities]. Stavropol': Kn. izd-vo, 1984. 287 s.
8. Podobedov A. V., Tarushkin V. I. Koncepciya rasshirennogo vosproizvodstva soevyh produktov [The concept of expanded reproduction of soybean products] // Agrarnaya nauka. 1998. № 7. S. 10-15.
9. Podobedov A. V. Potrebitel'skie svojstva soevogo belka [Consumer properties of soy protein] // Agrarnaya nauka. 2000. № 1. S. 10-11.
10. Rybas' I. A., Marchenko D. M., Nekrasov E. I., Ivanisov M. M., Grichanikova T. A., Romanyukina I. V. Ocenka parametrov adaptivnosti sortov ozimoj myagkoj pshenicy [Estimation of adaptability parameters of winter common wheat varieties] // Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2018. № 4(58). S. 51-54.
11. Sapega V. A. Urozhajnost' i parametry adaptivnosti sortov zernovyh kul'tur v lesostepi Severnogo Zaural'ya [Productivity and adaptability parameters of the grain crops varieties in the forest-steppe of the Northern Trans-Urals] // Doklady RASKHN. 2010. № 3. S. 10-14.
12. Hangil'din V. V. O principah modelirovaniya sortov intensivnogo tipa // Genetika kachestvennyh priznakov sel'skohozyajstvennyh rastenij [On the modeling principles of the varieties of intensive type]. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 111-116.
13. Hangil'din V. V., Biryukov S. V. Problema gomeostaza v genetiko-selekcionnyh issledovaniyah [The problem of homeostasis in genetic-breeding research] // Genetiko-citologicheskie aspekty v selekcii sel'skohozyajstvennyh rastenij. 1984. № 1. S. 67-76.
Review
For citations:
Ashiev A.R., Skulova M.V., Chegunova A.V. Homeostaticity of the collection samples of soybeans according to the trait “seed weight per plant”. Grain Economy of Russia. 2020;(5):68-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-71-5-68-72